February 5, 2013
Brian Carroll
Division of Medical Quality Assurance
4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C02
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Dear Mr. Carroll,
I am in receipt of your letter dated January 25th
addressing the recent re-filing of my ARNP collaborative agreement. To recap, this is a renewal of an existing
agreement that continues my relationship with the same physician listed on the
previous agreement. I must admit I was
quite shocked to learn that my agreement is incomplete because “physicians must
include their DEA number”.
Mr. Carroll, you may not know that Florida holds the dubious
distinction of being one of only two states left in the United States of
America in which ARNP’s are not allowed prescribing rights for controlled
substances of any type. There are
thousands of ARNP’s providing hundreds of thousands of hours of patient care of
all types every year, without the ability to order a single controlled
drug. It’s hard to believe it is down to
us and Alabama. It’s kind of
embarrassing when you think about it.
Therefore, I can hardly see the logic in requiring my
physician to provide her DEA number.
What possible purpose would that serve, other than tracking my physician
for some other reason that has nothing whatsoever to do with my ARNP agreement? It cannot have any relevance to my agreement,
since I have zero ability to prescribe controlled substances in my practice,
thanks to the FMA lobby and the Florida State Legislature. If you want to track down my physician, you
may simply use her license number as provided to you in our recently filed agreement.
To emphasize how ill-advised and inappropriate the MQA’s
request is, I am including a statement that can be easily located on the
Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Agency web site:
“DEA strongly opposes the use of a DEA registration number for any purpose other than the one for which it was intended, to provide certification of DEA registration in transactions involving controlled substances. The use of DEA registration numbers as an identification number is not an appropriate use and could lead to a weakening of the registration system.”
Available at: http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/pubs/manuals/pract/section2.htm. Accessed February 4, 2013.
As you can see, my hands are tied and I cannot provide you
with the DEA number you request, lest I run afoul of federal guidelines for
controlled substances. I find it quite
ironic that, while the state denies me a DEA number, the letter requesting the
DEA number is addressed to me rather than the physician who holds the
number. In other words, the state is
asking me to provide it with inappropriate access to a DEA number.
I hope this letter serves as further evidence, to add to the
giant pile of evidence that ARNP’s have provided to the state for the past 20
years, that nurse practitioners are careful stewards of regulations designed to
protect the health and safety of our citizens.
Sincerely,
Kim
Curry
Santamedical Launced New Wrist Digital Blood Pressure Monitor
ReplyDeleteBlood Pressure Monitor